> Filesystem. You have got VFAT. ;-)
I think Jo have been talking about a decent filesystem, not about a ms-dog
shit ;-)
> Seriously, VFAT isn't that bad and what I don't undertand is why noone
has
I haven't noticed VFAT would support executable flags, user and group
privileges and other stuff.
> ported Minix to MagiC as it should be realy easy. MagiC does support
> external filesystems as well and SPIN is available for both MagiC and
> MiNT, so it can be done without to much problems. There is also a nice
Hehe, ask the author of SPIN how easy it was to port it from MiNT to MagiC!
> Regarding internet apps, I don't need any as I have no internet account
> at home. ;-)
sounds like an answer from Magnus ;-)
> Also, STiNG is in the early development stages adn MiNT Net has been
around
> for years. There are also some nice internet clients for STiNG. Like
MyMail
> (a very promissing email client) and all the other clients for STiK.
There must
> be some decent FTP clients for STiK as well, or?
Yes, there's aFTP (from ATACK). They were talking with me last weekend
about TCP stacks under TOS, MiNT and MagiC. The result is that their next
internet application (wonderful e-mail client) will NOT support STing! Yes,
STing support causes them just headaches and hundreds of user questions why
it doesn't work.
> Well there are a few annoying things about the AES in MagiC, but the only
> one I can come up with now is the lack of toolbars in windows, but noone
> uses them anyway. MagiC supports most stuff found in AES 4.1.
Maybe that people use it, but you can't notice that since you run under
MagiC ;-))
> Also, I have found MagiC to be as compatible as N.AES+MiNT, if not better
> in some cases.
>
> The most annoying thing with N.AES is how it looks. It looks just awfull
> and clumsy like an elephant when you have got used to MagiC. :-)
Hopefully N.AES 1.2.0 will look better.
Petr
Received on to. nov. 13 1997 - 17:35:00 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: ti. nov. 03 2015 - 20:07:53 CET