Howdy,
> > I don't think the difference between a Hades040 and an AB040 should be
> >> significant, though.
> >
> >Probably not and I think it was a Hades040 Petr had tested it on.
>
> I was testing Hades60, believe me or not. The numbers of the faster Hades
> are at home, I'll send it tonight to the list.
Yeah please do. I can include them on my webpages.
> As for Hades40, the Nembench numbers are exactly the same (FastRAM reading,
> integer and FPU calculations) with only one exceptions: Hades40 has twice
> faster writting to FastRAM.
Oh, that's bad. ;-)
> And Magnus, please don't compare RAM and ROM speed results of Gembench :-)
Why not? I do what I like and I did get a quite strange discusion going...
:-)
//Magnus Kollberg
Received on ti. jan. 13 1998 - 20:41:00 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: ti. nov. 03 2015 - 20:07:53 CET