Re: Afterburner and Linux

From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska_at_nuts.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 20:52:54 +0200

On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Magnus Kollberg wrote:

> > He said "AB040", not Falcon. I'm pretty sure as well that there will
> > be no AB-support in new TOS-versions. But it will probably be more
> > 040- and 060-friendly, so a AB060 will hopefully be a reality :-)
>
> Oppsss... I missed that. But I still see no major difference between a TOS
> for the Falcon and the AB040. A properly written OS should work properly
> on both a 030 and 040 IMHO. :-)

The problem with the AB/Falcon is that it has both ST- and fast-RAM.
Also, TOS needs to be relocated/patched/remapped, so even with a
040/060-aware TOS we still need a TK-driver.

> But as you said it should work much better on the AB040 than 4.04 as the
> Milan is a 040 computer as the AB040.

...and hopefully a 060-computer :-) If they release a TOS-upgrade for
the Falcon I will definelately buy a a 060 upgrade-kit and test it in
my Falcon. If it doesn't work, I can always buy a Milan for it ;-)


/*
** Jo Even Skarstein http://www.stud.ntnu.no/~josk/
**
** beer - maria mckee - atari falcon - babylon 5
*/
Received on ti. juni 09 1998 - 20:52:54 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : ti. nov. 03 2015 - 20:07:54 CET